- Nascar heat evolution setups chicago drivers#
- Nascar heat evolution setups chicago full#
- Nascar heat evolution setups chicago series#
Are you going to tell Rick Hendrick or Joe Gibbs or Roger Penske that they have to cut from 500 to 50 employees, because that’s all the small teams can afford? That would be a nightmare on a lot of levels.īesides, with all due respect to the small teams, there’s a reason the big teams win: They do the best job. And on and on and on until modern day.Īnd if you set a spending cap, it would have to be geared to the small teams because they have no money. Then it was the Wood Brothers winning 49 races in the 1970s and Junior Johnson winning three straight titles with Cale Yarborough from 1976-78. In the 1960s, it was the Pettys and Holman-Moody. In 1955-56, Carl Kiekhaefer outspent everyone and won 52 races and two championships. Can’t be done.Īnd dominance by the top teams is nothing new. Look, I love seeing the little guys win as much as anyone else, but would be totally impossible to police a financial cap, Bob.
Nascar heat evolution setups chicago drivers#
It's turned into just about 10 drivers and 4 organization that have a chance to win because they can spend what they need to, to get the results they want. I know it would be practically impossible to oversee and I wouldn't have a clue how it could be handled but what about a financial cap on teams? The well-funded teams win almost all the races except for maybe a rainout and they win all the championships. To me, that’s a far bigger problem than ticket prices. That said, I’d love to see hotels in places like Bristol and Talladega quit gouging race fans. And you leave yourself vulnerable to be undercut on prices. When your main selling point is that your cheaper than the competition, you’re selling cost only and not the benefits of your product. They’re selling the quality of experience - everything from the racing itself to on-site concerts and camping - and the new features like wi-fi and bigger seats.Īnd that’s just smart marketing. That said, NASCAR and the track operators aren’t trying to sell NASCAR as the cheapest entertainment alternative.
Nascar heat evolution setups chicago series#
SMI tracks are offering $10 kids’ Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series tickets and most tracks are letting kids in free for XFINITY and Camping World Truck Series races. Lots of tracks have lowered prices, Jerry. Why not instead, lower ticket prices? – Jerry Amenities are being added to draw fans back to the tracks. Because of that, you couldn’t use stock production-car body dimensions for a race car.Īttendance at NASCAR events has been an issue for several years now. One other factor: Most of the cars that have been raced in NASCAR over the last 20 years were based on production cars with V-6 engines and front-wheel drive, while the race cars have V-8s and rear-wheel drive. We are now up to the sixth-generation car, which actually looks a whole lot more like a street car than the Generation 5 cars that ran from 2007-2012 did. In later years, NASCAR introduced different generations of race cars.
Nascar heat evolution setups chicago full#
The cars had to be modified with frames and full roll cages to keep the drivers safe. In the 1960s, NASCAR began to move from dirt short-tracks to big, fast tracks like Daytona, Charlotte and Atlanta. In the mid-1950s NASCAR began to let teams beef up the front ends of cars because they had a tendency to break parts on the rough dirt tracks they raced on back then. When NASCAR began the old Strictly Stock Series in 1949, the cars were just that - strictly stock. Was there ever a hard rule change or was this just a matter of evolution? Thanks. My question is: NASCAR has gone from requiring the cars that compete to be production cars available to the public to what we have now.
0 kommentar(er)
